Dainius » 18 Bir 2013, 10:27
Apie programų skirtumus komentuoja žmogus, kuris braižo ilgiau mei daugelis iš mūsų:
(copy paste iš cadtutor.net)
Well I hate to spoil the Microstation bashing party but I have been using both AutoCad and Microstation heavily for the last 24 years. I started out with AutoCad version 2.63 in 1987 and Microstation Version 3.3 in 1988. Microstation is hands down the Superior Cad Software. It's speed and stability outrank AutoCad 10 to 1. Not too mention the reading to the disc as you write to your drawing! Hmm, how often has your PC crashed and you've lost work in Autocad? Probably thousands of times more than Microstation. Whenever my PC crashed while using Microstation, I've lost maybe 1 command's worth of work. AutoCad is simply NOT condusive to high production Drafting. It's command application often involves way too many mouse clicks and steps to get a command completed. And because of that long drawn out command application if you screw up one single step, you find yourself slamming the escape key and starting ALL OVER again. And how many versions of AutoCad have there been in it's 30 years of existance? Like 28 or 29?!? Keep on trying Autodesk! And were talking what..9 Versions of Microstation in 26 years of it's existance. And the worst thing Microstation ever did was try and make it's software like AutoCAD in version 8. What Autocad needs to do is re-write the file format based on intergers instead of a floating point real number thus allowing a streamlined, shortened command application. And the 2 environments for Scaled drawing of Paper Space and Model Space?!? Puhleease, get that eliminated and put it all in one environment. And Attributed Blocks?!? Oh my what a time consumer there! And how 3rd party dependent is AutoCAD? Extremely! Years ago, when I was working as a contractor in a Federal Adminstration building, I had the pleasure of training many AutoCad users in Microstation. Yes, the learning curve took longer because of the Icon based command activation but once these folks learned Microstation they never wanted to go back to Autocad. Bottom line is, Microstation is far better because of it's stability, speed and dependability of command application. AutoCAD?!? yeah, you'll get there eventually. AutoCAD is a memory hog that is unstable and has many pandora boxes that can be opened thus the possibility of losing work, doing more re-work that in the end costs more money in hours billed to the client and less profit for businesses. Like the old Fram Oil commercials used to say: "You can pay me now! or you can pay me later". Yes AutoCad is cheaper than Microstation but you get what you pay for and it is a crying shame the industry has taken the cheap, easy way out for it eventually costs them in the end.